The "New Cold War?": 2016-present
With the rise of Xi Jinping to the position of CCP General Secretary in 2012, China began to adopt more assertive protocols in regards to domestic and foreign developments, notably seen in its aggressive rhetoric towards Taiwan along with its repressive policies observed in Hong Kong and the Xinjiang Autonomous Region. The election of President Trump in 2016 saw the exacerbation of tensions between China and the United States, hitting its peak during the U.S.-China trade war. Under Biden's administration, limited changes have been made on both sides in regards to engagement. Foreign policy analysts hold diverse views on this period in U.S.-China relations, with some arguing that past engagement has failed and the two nations might be heading towards an inevitable collision. This raises the question: Are the U.S. and China currently engaged in a "new Cold War"?

Oct 18, 2017 – Oct 24, 2017
Chinese president Xi Jinping first defines the key principles behind his vision for rejuvenating China under what he named the "Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era" (or "Xi Jinping Thought") during the 19th National Congress of the Chinese Communist Party. Shortly after its introduction, Xi Jinping Thought is promptly enshrined in the constitution of the CCP, marking a shift in the nation's policies both on the domestic and foreign level.
Two weeks after rising to the position of CCP General Secretary at the 18th Party Congress in 2012, Xi promptly articulated his vision of a “rejuvenated” and “strong” China encapsulated in the phrase “the China Dream”. This broad vision would set the foundation for “Xi Jinping Thought”, a development that would play a monumental role in shaping China’s foreign policy towards the United States.
As defined by China scholars Steve Tsang and Olivia Cheung, “Xi thought is Xi’s guide on how to reshape the reform and opening up, so that China can profit from it and strengthen regime security and party supremacy simultaneously.” In many of his writings and speeches pertaining to "Xi Jinping Thought", Xi attributes the influence of the West and “reform and opening up” behind issues of widespread corruption and power abuse within the Party and the wider nation. According to Xi, “opening up” led to greater admiration of the West, by which he claimed that China has suffered by aiming to maintain cordial relations with the West as opposed to firmly placing China’s individual interests first. He reasons that these developments have deteriorated the Party’s control over society and the economy, hindering China's rise as a global power. In defining these issues and their supposed root causes, Xi took inspiration from four main sources when developing his newfound ideology: Leninism, Maoism, Legalism, and Confucianism. Why did Xi embrace the values within these four differing ideologies? Put simply, he believes the tenets provided by them are instrumental in consolidating power and promoting the supremacy of the party. It is through implementing policies characterized by the combination of the four ideologies that Xi aims to address the issues he identifies in China above (of which, he of course points to the influence of the West).
​
By abandoning Deng Xiaoping's more balanced and pragmatic approach to foreign relations—characterized by his advice to "Hide your strength, bide your time, never take the lead"—the strategy towards relations with the United States shifted significantly under Xi Jinping. As promoted in Xi Jinping Thought, China is taking more assertive measures and protocols pertaining to both domestic (primarily in the Xinjiang region) and international security. Xi's efforts are seen in the swift military modernization of the PRC, the promotion of "wolf warrior diplomacy" (a diplomatic approach utilizing combative, aggressive rhetoric towards criticism of the CCP), the assertion of iron-fist control and surveillance over Hong Kong and the Uyghur people, along with vowing for the reunification of Taiwan under CCP control in the near future.


“A Muslim refugee train in northern India on its way from Delhi to Lahore, in 1947.” Source: Henri Cartier-Bresson/Magnum Press, published by Vivek Shankar/New York Times
October 6, 2018:
The Trump administration announces a series of tariffs on Chinese imports to the United States, affecting $34 million worth of Chinese products. During Donald Trump's presidency (2016–2020), the United States adopted a more confrontational approach toward China. Initially, the administration concentrated on addressing the trade deficit with China, attempting to induce change by imposing tariffs on Chinese imports. These efforts, however, did not achieve the desired results.
Early in his presidency, Donald Trump pursued a confrontational trade strategy with China, aimed at securing trade concessions. His approach included: (1) labeling China as a currency manipulator (which the U.S. Treasury briefly did in 2019 before reversing the decision), (2) addressing intellectual property theft and forced technology transfers, (3) urging China to end export subsidies and improve labor and environmental standards, and (4) implementing tax reforms, including reducing corporate tax rates to boost U.S. manufacturing. However, after these measures failed to elicit the desired concessions from China, Trump imposed tariffs on over $360 billion worth of Chinese goods, not $550 billion as initially stated. In retaliation, China placed tariffs on over $110 billion of U.S. products.
​
Throughout his presidency, Trump's focus on trade with China shifted, covering issues such as the trade deficit, intellectual property theft, Huawei, TikTok, and more. Much of the ongoing negotiations were marked by inconsistent progress and public statements on Twitter, reflecting Trump's personal involvement in the process.
The trade war had significant effects on the U.S. economy, including the loss of an estimated 300,000 jobs. Tariffs acted as a regressive tax on imports, with American consumers and businesses bearing much of the cost. Research from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and Columbia University found that U.S. companies lost at least $1.7 trillion in stock value due to the tariffs. While Trump succeeded in reducing the trade deficit with China—from a peak of $419 billion in 2018 to $311 billion in 2020—this did not reduce the overall U.S. trade deficit. The U.S. global trade deficit actually grew to $679 billion in 2020 from $481 billion in 2016, a 41% increase. This rise was driven by broader economic factors, particularly a persistent imbalance between U.S. spending and savings. While the tariffs reduced direct imports from China, they led to increased imports from other countries in the global supply chain, such as Vietnam, Mexico, and Thailand, limiting the shift toward domestic production.
The trade war also had substantial repercussions for the Chinese economy. The U.S. tariffs increased the cost of Chinese exports, reducing their competitiveness in the American market. This contributed to a slowdown in China’s economic growth, as business uncertainty and global supply chain disruptions added pressure. Chinese firms in technology and agriculture were particularly affected—tech companies faced higher costs for U.S. components, and agricultural exports like soybeans plummeted due to retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods.
​
In the U.S., businesses and consumers faced rising costs for imported goods, particularly in industries heavily reliant on Chinese imports, such as electronics and machinery. U.S. agricultural producers, including soybean and pork farmers, also suffered from reduced access to the Chinese market, leading to financial difficulties. The trade war increased market uncertainty and affected investment decisions, contributing to volatility in financial markets. While there were some short-term benefits, such as increased domestic production in certain sectors, the overall economic impact was marked by rising costs and market instability.
By the end of 2020, U.S. officials characterized the relationship with China as one of "strategic competition," and some commentators referred to it as a "new Cold War." However, this analogy has limitations. (1) Unlike the ideological rivalry of the Cold War, China does not seek to impose its political system globally in the same way the Soviet Union did. (2) The U.S. and China are far more economically interdependent than the U.S. and Soviet Union ever were, with extensive trade, educational, and cultural exchanges complicating the possibility of a purely adversarial relationship akin to the Cold War.
November 15, 2023

President Joe Biden and Xi Jinping hold a meeting in Woodside, California, nearly a year after their last encounter in Bali. In light of worsening tensions between the two nations, expectations for potential agreement or cooperation were considerably low. Despite this, the summit produced relatively positive results as Chinese and American leaders found some areas of common ground amid issues of contention. (And, most importantly, pandas.)
“A Muslim refugee train in northern India on its way from Delhi to Lahore, in 1947.” Source: Henri Cartier-Bresson/Magnum Press, published by Vivek Shankar/New York Times
During their talks, several significant agreements emerged. Xi pledged to address the production of illicit fentanyl, a pressing issue impacting the U.S. and Latin American drug networks. Furthermore, the leaders consented to restore military communications, ensuring future dialogues across the military hierarchy. They also committed to further discussions on artificial intelligence, with a focus on addressing associated risks and safety concerns. Biden’s aim was to showcase the effectiveness of personal diplomacy in advancing U.S. interests. During the meeting, national security adviser Jake Sullivan highlighted that Biden sought tangible outcomes that align with American priorities, reinforcing the value of high-level engagement.
​
In their private discussions, Biden urged Xi to leverage his influence to mitigate global tensions, particularly regarding the Iran-Israel conflict; the impact of these appeals remains uncertain. Biden also pressed Xi to maintain the current stance of withholding military support for Russia’s Ukraine invasion. On the sensitive issue of Taiwan, Biden and Xi engaged in a direct and measured dialogue: Biden reiterated the U.S. commitment to the "One China" policy while asserting the importance of arming Taiwan as a deterrent. Xi reassured Biden of no immediate plans to invade Taiwan but faced calls to temper China’s military expansion and refrain from influencing Taiwan’s upcoming elections. Amidst China’s economic challenges, Xi advocated for lifting U.S. sanctions and modifying export controls. While there is no indication that Biden will concede to these demands, the meeting itself might help stabilize investor confidence in China’s economic prospects.
​
​